Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FilmFantastic Gold Coast Film Festival
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. — Jake Wartenberg 02:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FilmFantastic Gold Coast Film Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
a non notable film festival. only 1 hit on gnews despite it occuring every year since 2004. [1]. LibStar (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't look to be any significant coverage of this event. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep With respects to the nominator, I found 27 g-news hits. No doubt we used different search parameters. I would surmise from looking at the articles in Gold Coast Bulletin, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Courier Mail, Advocate, Sydney Morning Herald , and Brisbane Times that it meets the WP:GNG for notability. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 02:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. I couldn't fully evalute the sources found by MQS because many were behind paywalls but of those I could see most were just mentions in articles on other topics. Still, there is probably enough here to support an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.